Chapter 9 The IS Curve 95
b. For 2012:Q2 to 2013:Q1, personal consumption averaged $11,205.4 billion, and from 2011:Q2 to
2012:Q1 it averaged $10,839.3 billion. Disposable personal income over the same periods
3. a. From 2012:Q2 to 2013:Q1, the average change in investment was $18.75 (billion).
b. From 2012:Q1 to 2012:Q4, the average change in ri was –0.48.
c. The ratio of the changes is 18.75/–0.48 = –39.06; the absolute value of this represents the
coefficient d on the investment function; that is, for every 1 percentage point increase in ri, real
private domestic investment falls by about $39 billion.
d. From 2008:Q3 to 2009:Q2, the average change in investment was –$155.83 (billion), and from
2008:Q2 to 2009:Q1, the average change in ri was 0.86. The coefficient on investment, d during
that period is the absolute value of –155.83/0.86, or d = 181.2. Thus, for every 1 percentage point
increase in ri, real private domestic investment would fall by about $181.2 billion. This is
significantly higher than during the current period; the financial frictions component partly helps
explain the significant decline in investments during the financial crisis period despite real
interest rates being relatively low; however, other factors are clearly at play that pushed the drop
in investment (and hence the increase in the coefficient) much higher than it is today that can’t be
captured by the financial frictions data series (for instance, prospects for long-term growth). In
other words, in order to have the coefficient be comparable to what it is today, the financial
frictions measure would have to be much higher to capture the drop in investment seen during the
financial crisis.