
Instructor’s Manual for Macroeconomics, Fourth Canadian Edition
5. New end-of-chapter problems.
TEACHING GOALS
Chapter 3 demonstrated there are strong regularities associated with the comovements
among macroeconomic variables. Though business cycles are remarkably similar,
understanding their causes is a difficult task. There are multiple alternative business cycle
models, and students need to understand how these models are different – in terms of
what causes business cycles in these alternative models, and what the policy prescriptions
are. In need not be the case that we want to totally dismiss any business cycle models.
Potentially many models could give us useful insight what business cycles are about.
The models in this chapter are all based on flexible wages and prices. Sometimes these
are called “equilibrium” models, but even models with sticky wages and prices – for
example the New Keynesian model in Chapter 14 – have some notion of equilibrium. It is
important for students to understand, in spite of the fact that much of Keynesian
economics is done with sticky-wage-and-price models, that Keynesian ideas do not
depend on sticky wages and prices.
There are three elements in any business cycle model that are important: the impulses
(shocks), the propagation mechanism, and the policy conclusions. In the real business
cycle (RBC) model, the impulses are shocks to total factor productivity (TFP), these
shocks are propagated through the optimizing choices that are made by economic agents,
and in the baseline model there is no role for policy. In the Keynesian coordination
failure model the impulses are endogenous – self-confirming optimism and pessimism.
Propagation occurs in the same way as in the RBC model, but there may be a role for
government policy in improving matters. Either model fits the data as well as the other.
The last model in this chapter is a New Monetarist model, which is included to capture
specifically some features of the financial crisis, rather than as a general model of
business cycles. The novelty is the idea that financial liquidity is important in financial
crises, and that this requires a different way of thinking about monetary policy.
CLASSROOM DISCUSSION TOPICS
A key idea in this chapter is that a preliminary evaluation of a model’s usefulness
involves fitting the data. It would be good to discuss why this is valid. Might we imagine
models that did not fit the data well but might nevertheless be useful? Do we want the
model to fit all the data? Surely a model intended for the study of business cycles need
not give good predictions about the price of orange juice ten years from now.