Charisma: Charisma is the ability to inspire or influence others. Charismatic
leadership that combines learned skills with the ability to transform an
organization, in addition to internal traits, is referred to as transformational
leadership.
Transformational versus Transactional Leadership: Transformational/charismatic
leadership is traditionally contrasted with transactional leadership; Bernard Bass
defines a transactional leader as one who recognizes follower needs and tries to
see that the organization satisfies those needs if employee performance warrants
it.
• Behavioral Theories of Leadership
Ohio State/Michigan Studies: The behavioral perspective of leadership identifies
two dimensions of leader behavior: task orientation and people orientation. This
perspective has been used to argue that the most effective leaders exhibit high
levels of both types of behaviors, irrespective of a given situation.
Leadership Grid: Leadership Grid has categories based on a 9 by 9 matrix. This
grid identifies various types of leadership behavior based on two independent
dimensions of concern for production and concern for people.
International Perspectives on Behavioral Theories: There is evidence that
different cultures will find different positions on the Leadership Grid to be most
effective.
• Contingency Theory
Fiedler’s Contingency Theory: Fiedler argued that there are two fundamental
types of leadership: task orientation and relationship orientation. The best
leadership style is determined by three conditions or contingencies. The first
contingency is the leader-member relationship. The second contingency is task
structure, which is the degree to which employees’ tasks are routine, in contrast to
varied tasks. The third contingency is the power inherent in the leadership
position.
Hersey–Blanchard Situational Leadership: They argued that contingency was the
appropriate approach because it allows flexibility in types of leadership as
required in different settings. Specifically, they argued that effective leaders must
also vary their style of leadership based on the employees’ level of maturity.
There are four levels of employee maturity. An employee’s maturity is